RKJ 09 - Jesus & Lazarus Resurrections Difference || यीशु और लाज़र के पुनरुत्थान में अंतर | Part 2

Description

RKJ 09 - Jesus & Lazarus Resurrections Difference || यीशु और लाज़र के पुनरुत्थान में अंतर | Part 2 "Reels Ke Jawab" is a Series debunking Popular Reels against Christianity and Common Sense! In this video, we respond to one of the claims of the viral video of Hindutva baba Anirudh who says that the Resurrection of Jesus is not unique because there are many cases where people rose from the dead. Lazarus rose again like Jesus so he is god too? इस वीडियो में, हम हिंदुत्व बाबा अनिरुद्ध के वायरल वीडियो के दावों में से एक का जवाब देते हैं जो कहते हैं कि यीशु का पुनरुत्थान अद्वितीय नहीं है क्योंकि ऐसे कई मामले हैं जहां लोग मृतकों में से जी उठे हैं। लाज़र भी फिर से जी उठा तो क्या वह भी भगवान है? --------------------------------------------------------------- Watch Part 1 👉🏻 RKJ 08 - Is the Resurrection of Jesus Unique? क्या यीशु का पुनरुत्थान अनोखा है? Bro. Francis| Part 1 Video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fybim7o5eHk 👉🏻Did Jesus Really Die on the Cross? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpTn3sr_-LU 👉🏻क्रूस और पुनरुत्थान पर आपत्तियों का जवाब || Answering Objection Against Crucifixion & Resurrection https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvmxckCHejs 👉🏻क्रूस और पुनरुत्थान स्टडी https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC4pYuVpL3s73dsaM3ZW7He3IE7SXBYmt&si=IRi8kNTK3RaD2kzT 👉🏻More Videos https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLC4pYuVpL3s7GaceTUJYZ6sU54xvf2QF9&si=ft4EJblI6QoAdQVS --------------------------------------------------------------- Watch, Like, Share & pray for our Team #viralvideo #aniruddhacharyaji #rkj #GAvideos #francis #jesus #krishna Our FACEBOOK page: - www.facebook.com/gloryapologetics Telegram : t.me/gloryapologetics Email: gloryapologetics@outlook.com As Per Indian THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957 (ACT NO. 14 OF 1957) Section 52 Which deals with acts which are not to be infringement of copyright states as follows, quoted below - 52. Certain acts not to be infringement of copyright.- (1) The following acts shall not constitute an infringement of copyright, namely,- 4[(a) a fair dealing with any work, not being a computer programme, for the purposes of- (ii) criticism or review, whether of that work or of any other work; As per this criticism or review, whether of that work or of any other work; will not be considered infringement of copy right. This fair use is permitted as per the COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957 (ACT NO. 14 OF 1957) Section 52. All contents on this channel - Glory Apologetics are either criticism or review as per the permitted COPYRIGHT ACT.